Use Back button to return.

Features

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Are we winning drug ‘war?’


 

 

By JIM STREET

Ed & Pub

Last week in this space, we touched on the drug problem as being at least one major key to our immigration nightmare.

We have been waging a “war on drugs” since President Richard Nixon first proclaimed it as such in 1971. But the nation’s efforts to make drug use illegal go back to the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act of 1914, which was aimed at opiates.

We’ve been “at war” for 40 years but clearly, it is not working. There is as much drug use today as ever. If not more.

If a product advertized, “It’s not working! Better buy some,” would you run out and buy it?  

On this issue, people on my side of the political discourse make the same mistake as those on the other side do on things like guns. Just pass a law and they will go away.

Except it doesn’t work. We should have learned that lesson with Prohibition. But we didn’t. 

 

OPINION

 

Drinking had become a real problem early in the 20th Century and people figured if we would just make booze illegal, people would sober up.

But people didn’t and the ensuing black market resulted in a vast increase in organized crime. Make something illegal and it just goes underground and the price naturally skyrockets. 

Suppliers now have to charge more because of the higher risk in delivering the product. And every time you “interdict” a supply line, simple laws of supply and demand result in higher prices.

The theory is that the much higher price will make people decide not to use drugs.

That works with what some economists call an “elastic” demand. If the price of going to the movies goes up, you may decide to rent a DVD or just play cards or something.

But it does not work with an “inelastic” demand like drugs. If you need heart surgery or a Pacemaker, for example, what it costs has little effect on your decision to get it. That’s an inelastic demand.

If you are strung out on drugs, you will get your “fix,” no matter what it costs. If you can’t afford it with what your job pays – presuming you still have a job – you’ll steal it.   

The only meaningful argument I have heard for strong drug laws is that the price might discourage someone from starting drug use in the first place.

OK. But after 40 years – or really 96 years – you’d think nobody would have started because the cost was too steep.

Think again.

Our drug laws have created a giant black market and this is a major reason for the extreme violence across that little stream just south of here they call the Rio Grande.

I usually find myself on the same side politically with commentators like Rush Limbaugh.

But not always.

Rush noted recently that Mexico had legalized drugs and wondered how there could still be violence if legalizing drugs were the answer.

Hello, Rush. The reason for the drug violence is the humongous price people will pay for drugs and that market is on this side of that Rio.

Take the black market profit out of the equation and see how much people are willing to kill just for market share.

Talk of “legalizing” drugs brings the immediate retort that that would mean any ten-year-old would be able to buy crack cocaine.

No, a ten-year-old can’t buy booze or cigarettes either. But they are legal products. Perhaps “decriminalization” would be a better word.

We spend billions of dollars each year busting kids for a couple of joints. Then we keep them locked up at the expense of even more billions.

And our cops spend much of their time trying to find drugs instead of catching the real crooks.

Yes, some drugs do cause people do bad things. OK, arrest them if they commit a crime. But if all they are doing is getting high at home, they are not hurting anyone but themselves.

Education is a far better tool than busting people just for having drugs in their possession.

I remember 40 years ago, you would go to a noon meeting. There was an ash tray at every place and a server would take drink orders. There would be a few wine or beer drinkers but most would order hard liquor. At noon.

Today, even at an evening meeting, if alcohol is served at all, it is usually only wine and beer. If you want to smoke, you have to go outside to do so.

And booze and tobacco have been completely legal all this time.

Let our cops protect us from real crimes and treat drug abuse as the medical problem it is.

That will solve a host of problems.

Including the violence across the border.

Two languages best

By CARLOS I. URESTI

State Senator

The old saying about cooperation and problem solving — two heads are better than one — continues to withstand the test of time.

That same idea is quickly becoming the foundation of another common wisdom. Two languages are better than one.

Because of Texas' economic and cultural ties to Mexico and our rapidly changing demographics, the linguistic diversity that has always existed in the Lone Star State is becoming more common and more important — both socially and economically.

 

OPINION

 

This new reality is evident everywhere in Texas, particularly in the counties of Senate District 19.

We see it every day in our schools, churches and work-places. It must be embraced and encouraged and a great way to do that is through dual language education.

Currently, there are more than 20 dual language schools in the district and these programs have already shown great success among minority children.

The ability to communicate in two languages gives students the opportunity to explore both their native and adoptive cultures and the skills they need to be successful.

The benefits of dual language programs are forcing school districts across the state to take a second look at traditional bilingual education where children are instructed in their native language while transitioning into English.

In these programs, students tend to lose their native language. And when that happens, more is lost than just the words.

Dual language programs teach academic content in both their native language and English.

In many programs, children who only speak English learn Spanish and children who speak Spanish learn English.

Both the native speaker and the English speaker are in the same classroom.

The dual language emersion approach is clearly more beneficial to students in Texas, which is already a so-called "minority-majority" state, and will post a Hispanic majority in the near future.

Dual language programs validate native tongues, provide more confidence to native speakers and make both Hispanics and Anglos more competitive in the job market.

More and more, educators are viewing dual language education as a way to close the achievement gap between non-English speakers and their counterparts in public schools.

It provides native Spanish speakers with the English language skills they need and enriches the lives of native English speakers who want to learn a second language.

So for students who hail from both cultures, dual language programs foster knowledge, understanding and mutual respect and widen everyone's path to succeed.

In the Texas that is fast approaching, two languages will be much better than one.

 

 

     Tumbleweed Smith : Texas Tales

 

How to deal with a cop killer

Larry Gill is a historian and is active in the Merkel museum, which is celebrating its fifth anniversary this year.

The museum has had an active five years. It started out in a building that once was a western wear store.

It filled up quickly because residents of Merkel anxiously donated articles of historic interest. Two building expansions have increased the museum to more than three times its original size.

The displays of vehicles, photographs, uniforms and other items are so well done the museum looks like it has been there for decades.

When Larry is not doing museum work, he serves as a constable. Occasionally both his jobs come together in some of his presentations to school kids.

“I love to dress up in some of the costumes and uniforms we have around here,” Larry said. “Sometimes I dress up like Johnny Reb and tell some Civil War stories.

“Since I’m a peace officer, one of my favorite stories in the museum is about an incident that occurred back in 1925 when a Merkel constable was killed,” he said. “When I tell it, I wear my law enforcement clothes complete with gun, gunbelt, hat, bandana and boots and try to re-enact the story.

“The sheriff from Big Spring came to Merkel and told the constable he needed some help,” Larry said. “He said a man from Merkel had killed a man in Big Spring and the killer was working on a farm south of Merkel.

“The sheriff and constable go out there to find the wanted man in a field grubbing tree stumps,” he said. “As they walked toward the man, he reaches down and picks up a rifle he had lying on the ground and shoots the constable in the stomach.

“He falls and crawls over against a tree,” Larry said. “The sheriff starts running to keep out of the line of fire and borrows a car from a neighboring farmer.

“As he is driving off, the man with the gun catches up to him and shoots him,” he said. “Then he went back to the constable, took the pistol from the constable’s holster and shot him in the head.

“He then came back to Merkel to tell his family goodbye and began running south,” Larry said. “They caught him at Lohn. He was hiding in a boxcar.

“There was a huge posse. Thousands of people were looking for this guy,” he said. “The posse was led by the Abilene police chief.

“The assistant chief walked up to the man in the boxcar and told him if he would surrender he wouldn’t be hurt,” Larry recounted. “He shot the assistant chief in the leg.

“That was it,” he said. “Some of the men had dynamite and they threw it under the boxcar.

“They got his body out of there, secured it with a rope on the running board of the Abilene police chief’s car, then they drove all over the county showing this man off, sending the message that you don’t kill law enforcement officers,” Larry said. “That might not go over too much today but it seemed perfectly all right in 1925.”

The museum has a photograph of the man tied to the running board of the Model A vehicle.

The people in Merkel didn’t want him buried in the local cemetery but he was taken out to the cemetery at night and placed in an unmarked grave.

 

Meditations by Brother J

 

Two Goats and Three Lambs

They are a sight to see as they run behind his pickup following him. He can call to them and they come running.

Sometimes, he even takes them for rides in the back of his pickup and they are happy to ride in the back. Anyway, they do not jump out.

They would not be alive if he had not found them, brought them home and cared for them.

He found them in the pasture as newborns and too weak to get up or follow their mamas.

He provided a warm shelter, milk for them and lots of TLC and they survived.

Those dogies remind me of something in the Bible, which says we were like lost sheep and with no hope but God loved us and sent someone to rescue us (John 3:16.)

That was His only begotten son Jesus Christ. Not everyone will allow Jesus to rescue them or they will have nothing to do with Him and they are not of His flock (John 10:26 and 27.)

Everyone is important, even just one lost sheep (Matthew 18:12.)

He looks and wants to rescue lost sheep (Luke 15:6). He knows the sheep that He has rescued and they know Him (John 10:3 to 5.)

He gave His life for us (John 10:14 and 15.) Have you allowed Him to rescue you?

See you in Church next Sunday.

Brother J

 

The Stargazer: Paul Derrick

 

The Big Dipper

Of the very brightest stars, called first-magnitude stars, none is in the northern-most night sky. Yet that part of the sky holds seven moderately bright stars that form a pattern more familiar than any of the brightest stars.

The Big Dipper, probably the best-known pattern in the entire northern hemisphere, is part of the constellation named Ursa Major, the Big Bear.

The Little Dipper, part of Ursa Minor or the Little Bear, is not so easy to identify as four of its seven stars are faint.

It does, however, contain the North Star, also known as Polaris.

Since it is straight up from Earth's North Pole, Polaris never moves in our sky. It is always due north and the same distance in degrees above the horizon as the latitude from which it is being viewed.

The two stars forming the outer end of the Big Dipper's bowl are "pointer stars" pointing toward Polaris.

Polaris is like the center of a 24-hour clock with all the other stars moving around it like the clock's hands, although in a counterclockwise direction.

And just as stars circle Polaris, so do star patterns, including the Big Dipper.

Depending on the season and time of night, the Big Dipper might be above, below or east or west of Polaris.

There's a legend that helps know where to look for the Big Dipper in the early evening.

In the fall, the dipper is due north below Polaris, down near Earth filling its bowl with water.

In the winter it is to the east, or right, of Polaris with its bowl tilted on its side and its handle pointing downward.

The water doesn't spill out because, being winter, it's frozen.

In the spring, the Big Dipper is again due north but now above Polaris in an upside-down position.

The water, now thawed, is pouring out of the dipper's bowl bringing us spring rains.

By summer, the dipper has swung around to the west, or left, of Polaris with its bowl again tilted on its side and its handle pointing upward.

It no longer has any water to spill on Earth, accounting for our dry, hot summers.

And the next fall it again swings down near Earth to again fill its bowl with water and begin the cycle anew.

Right now in the early evening, as spring is about to turn to summer, the Big Dipper is to the upper left of Polaris.

 

Sky Calendar.

Friday, June 4, the Moon is at third quarter.

Sunday morning, June 6, the crescent Moon is to the upper right of Jupiter low in the east before dawn.

Sunday evening, June 6, Mars is just to the upper left of Leo's bright star Regulus high in the west.

Tuesday morning, June 8, Jupiter passes less than a moonwidth from Uranus. Seeing much fainter Uranus requires binoculars.

Thursday morning, June 10, the crescent Moon is above Mercury low in the east northeast at dawn and the next morning to Mercury's left.

Early evenings, Thursday through Saturday, June 10 to 12, Venus and Gemini's bright stars Pollux and Castor are aligned and equally spaced low in the west at dusk.

Saturday, June 12, the Moon is new.

Early Monday evening, June 14, the crescent Moon is below Venus low in the west.

Wednesday evening, June 16, the crescent Moon is below Mars and then to Mars' left the next night.

Friday evening, June 18, the first quarter Moon is below Saturn.


Naked-eye Planets.

The Sun, Moon and planets rise in the east and set in the west due to Earth's west-to-east rotation on its axis.

Evenings, "Evening star" Venus is prominent in the west northwest, Mars is mid way up in the west and Saturn is high in the southwest.

Mornings, Jupiter rises two hours before the break of dawn with Mercury very low in the east at dawn.

Stargazer appears every other week, space permitting. Paul Derrick is an amateur astronomer who lives in Waco. Contact him at 918 N. 30th, Waco, TX 76707, (254) 753-6920 or paulderrickwaco@aol.com. See the Stargazer Web site at stargazerpaul.com.

 

Movie Reviews : Ed Layton

 

 

‘Robin Hood’ reviewed

If you’re looking for the romantic tale of Robin Hood in Sherwood Forest, Friar Tuck and Little John with the wonderful Maid Marion, her soft yet remote affections drawing at Robin’s emotions, don’t go see this movie.

On the other hand, if you’re looking for an action movie with lots of battles, royal court double crossing, treachery and the historic attempt by France to invade England, then, by all means, seek this movie out.

Legend is a solidly formed series of myths that have emanated from the oral stories that were repeated for hundreds of years by a specific ethnic or social group of people.

Robin Hood is such a legend.

It started at the end of the Crusades and the fall of the Roman Empire in the 1200s and 1300s.

Robin was a sole adventurer for 300 years, robbing the rich and giving to the poor.

Friar Tuck, Little John and Maid Marion entered into the story more than 300 years later as writers continued to expand on the legend with enthusiastic literary license.

Enter Ridley Scott, director of “Gladiator,” with screenwriter Brian Helgeland, deciding to create a story of Robin Hood’s humble beginning before the legend. A prequel, if you will.

Robin Hood’s legend is tampered with, where legend becomes further fictionalized and passed off as authentic.

This is a movie that will dazzle with battles, blood and gore.

Robin’s character, played by Russell Crowe, is not the affable, likeable man played by Errol Flynn in 1938 or Kevin Costner’s 1999 portrayal.

This Robin Hood is a serious, brooding, battle-weary veteran of the Crusades who wants nothing more than rest and distance from battle.

The story really begins when a dying knight makes Robin promise to return his sword, illicitly taken from his father, to go to war as a young man.

Robin agrees to this dying man’s request and thus the plot develops.

Robin, a yeoman archer well below knight status, and his men don the uniforms of deceased knights and return to a hero’s welcome in England.

In his quest to return the sword, he meets Maid Marion Loxley, the dead knight’s widow, and father-in-law Sir Walter Loxley, to whom the sword belongs.

So, in this story, Maid Marion, played by the forever anemic looking but stunning beauty Cate Blanchette, is of lower nobility, unfortunately downgrading her from the original legend.

The story continues and Robin is asked by the old Sir Walter Loxley, played by the very capable Max von Sydow, to take his son’s place in the family as his son who has returned from King Richard’s wars.

Robin is amused and Maid Marion scoffs at the idea but both acquiesce for the sake of the family and the lands.

The feudal Lords of England have been taxed to their limit and a rebellion is stirring only to be averted as the nation unites to repel an invasion by King Philip of France.

This brings you to the final climax of the movie and you’ll have to go see it to find out what happens.

Two pleasures for me, not to mention the fair Cate Blanchette, in this movie was
seeing William Hurt play Sir William Marshall, an ambas-sador, and Max von Sydow, two of my favorite actors I haven’t seen in a while.

Yes, I liked the movie. Yes, I recommend it. Yes, go see it.  Ed’s rating is three out of four stars. «««

“Robin Hood” came in at $37.1 million, which is a very respectable showing against a power house like “Iron Man,” which takes the weekend with $53 million The next highest movie was “Letters to Juliet” bringing in $13.9 million. 

“Letters” is a very sweet chick flick that will do OK dollar wise, But “Iron Man” and “Robin Hood” will dominate the money until “Prince of Persia” debuts on the 27th with Jake Gyllenhaal.

“Sex and the City 2” also will come out that weekend but it will fizzle at the box office.

‘Clash of the Titans’

"Release the Kraken." Zeus (Liem Neeson) orders Hades to punish the rebellion by men against the gods. 

Hades has an agenda of his own, go become leader of all the gods and reign hell on man.

To the rescue comes Perseus, played by Sam Worthington, the heroic Jake Sully from “Avatar.” 

Perseus is the unknowing  illegitimate son of Zeus. The action begins when Perseus begins his quest to defeat the Kraken and send Hades back to the depths of darkness.

There are great action scenes that will have you white knuckling the armrest of your theater seat.

Sam Worthington as Perseus gives a visual feast of action scenes throughout the movie.

Medusa, played by an unknown, Natalie Vadianova, will strongly repulse and captivate simultaneously with her head of undulating snakes.

The computer graphics are superb and border on the quality we saw in Avatar.

A PG-13 with no nudity and no vulgar language, the plot may have been weak but, then again, this is a mythological story. 

So far, grossing in at $125-plus million, I'm sure we'll see more mythology movies.

Who knows what Zeus, Apollo, Poseidon or Aphrodite will be up to next?

If you like action movies, go ahead, see or rent this one. You won't be disappointed.

Ed's rating is three and a half stars. «««1/2

 

‘Date Night’ funny

 

“Date Night” is a very funny, if not hilarious, movie. Rated PG 13, I was a little uncomfortable with the numerous sexual innuendos and double-entendres. 

There was no nudity and negligible foul language, which, I'm supposing makes the sexual dialog more acceptable.

I can only say I wouldn't take my 13-year-old daughter to this movie.  I felt it should be PG-17.

Having said that, as an adult, I enjoyed the movie.

Phil and Claire played by Steve Carell (The Office, The Forty Year Old Virgin) and Tina Fey (Saturday Night Live, Sarah Palin impersonator) depict an ordinary couple from the New Jersey "burbs" who become involved in a case of mistaken identity.

The premise is formulaic but this movie makes it work.  The mistaken identity results from them stealing a restaurant reservation. 

The adventure begins while they're enjoying their dinner, thinking they've been busted when two thugs approach them and ask them to step outside. 

Well, that’s not quite what happens. They end up being chased by mob thugs and corrupt police.

The ensuing chase and evasion scenes become the hilarious mainstay of the movie.

You will laugh at the mishaps and turn-arounds that occur.

There is an obligatory car chase that has a new twist and will leave you holding your stomach in uncontrollable, raucous laughter.

The Hollywood staple, Mark Walberg (Four Brothers), makes a surprise appearance as a by- chance person who reluctantly assists them out of their potentially fatal situation.

I enjoyed the Phil and Claire characters. Steve Carell and Tina Fey work well together and played out the mayhem superbly. 

I'm recommending this movie as a PG-17.  I give it three and a half stars out of four.  Enjoy. «««1/2

 

Mailbox

 

Control ‘uncontrollable’ spending

To the Editor,

Our country is facing economic ruin due to the uncontrolled, irresponsible spending by an out of control Congress.

One of the biggest offenders is Ciro Rodriquez. For example, he voted in favor of funding for the following government studies:

Why young adults use malt liquor and marijuana in combination, $389,357.

The impact of alcohol on "hookup" behavior of female college students, 219,000.

A study whether mice become disoriented when they consume alcohol $8,408.

Developing a program for machine-generated humor, $712,883.

Studying methamphetamine and the female rat sex drive, $28,000.

Study the division of labor in ant colonies, $950.000.

These are just a few egregious examples of the fraudulent and wasteful spending by Congress that is contemptuous of the electorate.

While we struggle to pay our bills, this is how Congress wastes our tax dollars.

At the same time, Medicare is facing a 21.3 percent decrease in funding that will result in lack of physicians who will accept Medicare and Tricare. This impacts the elderly and the military.

It is time to replace Ciro with a congressman who doesn't view our tax dollars as monopoly money and doesn't view the electorate as cash cows for the irresponsible spending schemes that are destroying this nation.

Donald Baker

Lampasas

Uncles does card

To the Editor,

In response to the story “Store ‘cards’ electronically, News Leader, June 6, page 5, although Uncles of Sanderson does not “swipe” IDs, we are committed to preventing the use of tobacco and alcohol by underage persons.

We do “card” persons who appear under age as stipulated by state law.

Gennie Merrifield

Uncles of Sanderson  

Set record straight

To the Editor,

The Rob McClellan Memorial Scholarship was started after Rob was killed on July 2, 1994.

This scholarship was started by the community and not by Reid, Jessie and Mike McClellan as stated in the News Leader.

We appreciate it and hope it continues to keep Rob’s memory alive through helping some student attend college.

Reid, Jessie

and Mike McClellan

Sanderson